Since we read about the cataloging, classification, and library
catalogues this week, I thought you’d enjoy these three articles. My Alma Mater,
The University of Wisconsin at Madison,
is finally mothballing their card catalog. “Farewell Cards” On Wisconsin
(Summer2012):31-35, 62 http://onwisconsin.uwalumni.com/features/farewell-cards/
I have very fond memories of the time I spent there looking up books
and exploring topics for research papers. When you read the article, you’ll
discover that their catalogue took up the entire floor of the building. It was
huge and contains so much information. Can you imagine such a large catalogue? New
York Public Library had a huge card catalogue as well. It also filled the
entrance to the reading room. Oh, the hours I spent lost in subject headings.
Today, librarians, researchers, and our other patrons use the catalogue
from home, or terminals scattered around the building. Finding great titles accidentally is more difficult. It’s a different type of learning and exploring
because you have to follow subject headings or browse the shelf. American Libraries e-extra for June
contains an article that examines how cataloging itself has changed. “Cataloging Then, Now, & Tomorrow” American Libraries (May/June 2012):
52-54 http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/b0fcde2b#/b0fcde2b/54
.
It may surprise you
to discover that not all libraries and librarians love classification systems.
Some think it’s time to get rid of them. Here’s
an article supplied by one of your fellow students Oder,
Norman. “Rangeview Library District,
CO, First System To Fully Drop
Dewey.” Library Journal (June 5,
2009): http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6663145.html
. A group of libraries decided to drop DDC and create use a simplified subject
heading system.
I find this
fascinating, especially since I teach about genealogy & local history
collections, which often arrange their materials geographically and then by
topic. After all, what good is a library where all the call numbers are the
same? I’m a strong advocate for classification schema, subject headings, and
fixed or controlled vocabulary. They make our jobs easier and allow us to group
like topics and things together. Natural language, tags, and key word searching
is great. Natural language is how search engines like Google use. For me,
personally, there’s a little too much fuzziness to searching when you don’t
know someone else’s terminology.
stop using the Dewey Decimal Classification System or Library of
Congress Classification schema?
(For earlier comments about catalogs, see late Feb, early March 2012.)
(For earlier comments about catalogs, see late Feb, early March 2012.)